Form fitness explorations in Architecture.


Seeking to escape site-specific narratives, programmatic limitations and typological control; this class will explore architecture’s own generative and material capacities to become an organizational mechanism that relates to function.

During this academic term, we will make use of thorough digital experimentation. The use of advanced NURBS operations, computational fluid dynamics and parametric growth engines will be critical to challenge the formal conventions of building envelope and supporting systems—skin/surface/structure and the complexity of boundary definers, tectonic values and circulation areas.

Starting from the study of reference objects, we will identify particular relationships between form and performance, followed by a series of dynamic analyses that would define strategies for form optimization. Using the resultant geometry information as a driver, students will digitally model and modify the original profiles to satisfy the requirements of two architectural applications that will vary in scale.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Creased performance


The final iteration of our design manifested three different bodies of program. A canopy condition addressed issues of air flows and water. The second condition acted more as a way of inserting a playground typology, monkey bars. The last body mostly embedded in the ground served as planters for recreation and enjoyment. The sectional distribution of these components allows children to play through and on top of the structure.
If imbedded into the ground, these planters would beginning to play with notions of natural and artificial surface. In order to quantify the funtionality of its design, we implemented a series of studies on a previous iteration: where this structure meets the ground, the integrity of the surface itself, as well as its ability to direct water away and into the openings. These studies showed us some necessity to recalibrate the topology of the structure in order to perform effectively.
We realized that the method of modeling was as important as the model itself. Switching from laminar to volumetric modeling allowed a continuous topology to embrace and redirect different flows of air and water.

No comments: